What's Bad About Education Technology

I want to start by saying that I am a huge advocate of technology in education.  I work in a one-to-one school and infuse technology into every activity and project in my class.  That being said, all great power can be wielded positively or negatively There are definitely some negative outcomes that can occur as technology floods into education.  Here are a few that a can lead educators and districts down a bad path.

Sorry Apple, but tablets that don't have full computer capabilities are are mistake as a one-to-one device.  You can try to make this square peg fit into the round hole of education, but you will have to jam it in to make it work.  I love my iPad, but I find it increasingly difficult to use compared to my Macbook when I do school work.  Problems with typing, moving from app to app, file management, compadibility, etc. can doom a one-to-one initiative if it becomes more cumbersome than paper and pencil.  I understand the cost prohibitive of a Macbook, but by the time you buy an iPad, accessories, apps, and other required equipment, you can nearly afford Macbooks, considering Apply will knock down the price on a large education purchase.  Don't go one-to-one because all the cool kids are doing it--with some device that "is good enough"--it will end up costing you more in the long run.

While we are talking about technology devices.  I have to get in a few shots at SMART Boards (SINO--smart in name only).  Spending valuable tech-dollars on SMART Boards is not a good investment of money or pedagogy.  These are a gargantuan waste of money for most classroom applications.  I can see the usefulness in a small elementary or special needs classroom, but in a classroom of 20+ students from middle school up--the only real purpose SMART Boards serve is a $8,000 projection screen.  Technology needs to be used for creation--student creation--not content delivery.  This leads me to my next point.

Using technology to replace or support traditional methods of direct instruction is a misuse of technology.  Computers are tools of creativity.  Schools are not going one-to-one to save paper.  Running worksheets through the Xerox machine to turn them into PDF's and digitizing multiple choice quizzes, based on a boring lecture are tech-crimes that should be met with corporal punishment at the very least.  This is bad and students will know it right away.  This stale method is not engaging to say the least, and it will lead to cheating and other discipline issues.   

Webinars are the absolute worst form of professional development and should be avoided at all costs.  If the video and audio feeds actually work, which is rare in my experience, a webinar is one of the most disengaging forms of learning I have experienced.  Short tutorials are useful, but a 5-person, conference-call-styled presentation is awkward and borderline absurd as a learning methods.  I understand if it is the last possible option, but it too closely resembles traditional direct instruction, only you're not in the same room--a method most effective teachers would laugh at.



8 comments:

  1. I agree with vitually everything you say in the article. We need to use technology as a supplement to classroom instruction or strictly for creativity. Smart board are a wast of money with the other products out there for 1/4th or less the cost. I'm a mac guy but like my laptop vs. iPad for education.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for your thoughtful comments. I can't tell you how many times I have heard schools talking about putting a SMART Board in every room with all the accessories, and then comment how they could never afford to go one-to-one... sad for the kids.
      Thanks again!
      Jusitn

      Delete
  2. I love your comments here. As an integration specialist, I have been fighting two battles - those who think that we shouldn't be going 1:1 and incorporating digital tools and those who think that they should make everything they do digital to save paper and such. I've developed some "rules" and guiding questions to help teacher determine what technology is beneficial and what isn't. I agree with all of your thoughts and they are confirmation for me that our decision to choose a netbook over an iPad and to adopted a blended learning model were wise choices. Our kids are too valuable to experiment with their education. We must use what we already know works.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much for your kind words. Others may disagree, but truly believe iPads are a mistake in place of a fully functional computer. If there is anything else I can offer, I would be happy to help, as I feel we are in this together. You can reach me by email at justin@ed-shift.com. Good luck!

      Delete
  3. i have to agree with you greg here.. we are spoiling our education by using lot of technology instead of books..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't mean to suggest we are spoiling our education. I just think there are good applications of technology and bad applications. An experience with a book is still valuable, but it can be enhanced by technology. Thanks for your comments.

      Delete
  4. Love and appreciate your thoughts but have to disagree with you on something.

    I love my iPad, but I find it increasingly difficult to use compared to my Macbook when I do school work.
    Problems with typing, moving from app to app, file management, compatibility, etc. can doom a one-to-one
    initiative if it becomes more cumbersome than paper and pencil.

    This is for you but what about kids? I see kids using iPads in great ways including typing and navigating from app to app. In fact, I see iPads keeping kids more on task as they are only able to stay on one app. A laptop or netbook creates a barrier between students that can inhibit collaboration. The iPad can create and and consume content in extraordinary ways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Dale,
      Thanks for your comments. You're right, many students can easily navigate and create on an iPad, but I don't think it lends itself to creation like a laptop does across the entire student body--just my experience. Its great for consumption, but less great for creation, IMO. You make an interesting point about focusing on one app. I think you are on to something there. Thanks again for the thoughtful comment!
      Justin

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.